CO2 Fractional Laser VS Traditional Laser Resurfacing

Co2 Fractional laser vs Traditional Laser Resurfacing which one has the best result. In this blog, we shall discuss the main differences, history and new technology that has evolved in this field.

The History of Laser Resurfacing: From CO2 to CO2 Fractional Laser Resurfacing

Laser resurfacing has been a popular cosmetic treatment for decades, helping people improve the appearance of fine lines, wrinkles, acne scars, and other skin imperfections. Over time, different types of laser resurfacing treatments have been developed, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. In this blog, we’ll explore the history of laser resurfacing and discuss why we believe CO2 fractional laser resurfacing is the better option for most people.

The First Laser Skin Resurfacing Treatment

The first laser skin resurfacing treatment was a breakthrough in cosmetic treatment that paved the way for the development of newer and more advanced techniques. The traditional laser resurfacing treatment that was used in the 1980s involved removing the entire outer layer of skin with a single beam of laser energy. While this technique effectively revealed smoother, more youthful skin underneath, it had several limitations.

One of the biggest drawbacks of traditional laser resurfacing was its longer recovery time. Since the treatment involved removing the entire outer layer of skin, it required several weeks of downtime to allow the skin to heal properly. Additionally, the procedure was often painful, which made it difficult for some people to tolerate.

The Development of CO2 Fractional Laser Resurfacing

In the 2000s, CO2 fractional laser resurfacing was developed as a more targeted and less invasive alternative to traditional laser resurfacing. This technique involves creating thousands of microscopic channels in the skin, leaving the surrounding tissue untouched. By doing so, CO2 fractional laser resurfacing promotes collagen production and cell turnover, resulting in smoother, more youthful skin.

One of the main advantages of CO2 fractional laser resurfacing over traditional laser resurfacing is its shorter recovery time. Since the procedure only targets a fraction of the skin, it requires less downtime and allows patients to resume their daily activities more quickly. Additionally, the process is less painful than traditional laser resurfacing, which makes it more tolerable for patients.

Another significant advantage of CO2 fractional laser resurfacing is its ability to treat all skin types, including darker skin tones. Traditional laser resurfacing was not recommended for darker skin types due to the risk of hyperpigmentation and uneven skin tone. CO2 fractional laser resurfacing, on the other hand, is safe for all skin types and can be customised to meet the unique needs of each patient.

Introducing the AW3® Regeneration™

At AllWhite Laser, we’ve taken CO2 fractional laser resurfacing to the next level with our advanced device called the AW3® Regeneration™. This state-of-the-art machine is designed to provide safe, effective, and customisable CO2 fractional laser resurfacing treatments to help you achieve your desired results.

Traditional vs. CO2 Fractional Laser Resurfacing

Traditional laser resurfacing removes the entire outer layer of skin with a single beam of laser energy, revealing smoother, more youthful skin underneath. While this treatment can be effective at reducing the appearance of fine lines, wrinkles, and sun damage, it has several drawbacks. Recovery time can be longer, and it can be more painful than CO2 fractional laser resurfacing. Additionally, traditional laser resurfacing is not recommended for darker skin types due to the risk of hyperpigmentation and uneven skin tone.

In contrast, CO2 fractional laser resurfacing with the AW3® Regeneration™ creates thousands of microscopic channels in the skin, leaving the surrounding tissue untouched. This promotes collagen production and cell turnover, resulting in smoother, more youthful skin. The AW3® Regeneration™ is effective at reducing the appearance of fine lines, wrinkles, acne scars, and sun damage; But it has several advantages over traditional laser resurfacing. It targets only a fraction of the skin, so it has a shorter recovery time and is less painful than traditional laser resurfacing. Additionally, CO2 fractional laser resurfacing with the AW3® Regeneration™ is safe for all skin types, including darker skin tones.

Choosing the Right Laser Resurfacing Treatment

In conclusion, we believe that CO2 fractional laser resurfacing with the AW3® Regeneration™ is the better option for most people seeking laser resurfacing. It’s effective at improving the skin’s appearance, and it has several advantages over traditional laser resurfacing, including a shorter recovery time, less pain, and the ability to treat all skin types. However, it’s important to consult with a qualified provider